.
Is he right to go after the Pope? DA in Toronto asks and callers respond. Another day in the life:
Caller suggests Pope a War Criminal. Mr. Anderson?
JA: There is a legal basis. To expose the offenders, it's a battle that's raging.
The Deejay keeps bringing up the large amount of money, $600 Million. Anderson says:
There are hundreds of thousands of cases where the Church has not been held to account. Financial settlements right now are the only way we can reach them.
CALLER: People want to go after the Pope, as who else are you going to blame? What kind of a crime do you have to commit in the Church to be turned over to the law?
ANDERSON: All evidence we've uncovered in 25 years in the U.S. leads to Rome.
They continue to keep secrets the way no other culture has been allowed to. Until they are held accountable, they will continue to protect offenders to avoid scandal and protect their reputation.
CALLER: I believe too, everything does lead back to the Pope. There is a coverup, the Pope has power and money to do whatever he wants.
CALLER: Oh absolutely not, if this many people were complicit, DA's would have seen it. We don't hold Judges and DA's responsible for what the criminals do.
ANDERSON: Every bishop answers to the ultimate superior, the Pope in Rome. The caller does not understand.
(Anderson with his firm Anderson Advocates in St. Paul, Minnesota, is waiting for U.S. Supreme Court to say he has the go-ahead to sue the Vatican.)
JA: Meantime we will continue to expose the documents that expose the Vatican's role, every time we get them.
.
Re Missing Link collection below: Email editor Jay Nelson of Albuquerque at jay@sarabite.info CLICK IMAGES to enlarge
Monday, April 12, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
How can you slam Anderson one week and then try to hug him the next? Who is confused you or me?
I don't think I've slammed Jeff Anderson. Are you implying that a report about SNAP is a report about Jeff Anderson that they are one and the same? Because I have been critical of SNAP recently, but I've never had a reason to be critical of Anderson, so, please expand.
ke
Post a Comment